April to October. November for the ridiculous playoffs. That's the
MLS season. Some wonder why teams like the New England Revolution,
DCU, Chivas USA with players like Marcelo
Gallardo,
Twellman, Sacha
Kljestan could possibly lose to lowly Panamanian
Tauro or Caribbean side Joe Public. No wonder
Beckham will be going
on loan to AC Milan for the duration of the long
MLS break. Who's to blame? That's complicated. Assuming the loan is for the winter months and that Milan officials are expecting him to play for the remaining of the season in 2009 and
possibly the
UEFA cup then he would effectively be missing two months our of the 2009
MLS season (April and May since April 15 marks the end of the
MLS transfer window) and possibly March if
MLS officials decide on a longer season. In all fairness, continuous competitive play would keep Becks healthy and in good standing for future call-ups to the national team by
Capello. In terms of the
MLS, however,
Becks's move would hamper ticket sales and credibility in the league both domestically and abroad.
Some of the "blame" could go to the salary cap currently imposed at
MLS. I say "blame" because in reality it's not such a bad idea. I think that the minimum should be raised, however, from $9,000 to at least $30,000 and while also raising the team-wide cap by at least 2 times as much whilst at the same time keeping the competitiveness that reigns in
MLS. Let's not forget that many European leagues are starting to look at
MLS's salary cap as an important way to cut their expenses and encourage more competitive leagues instead of having the same 4 teams always at the top of the table and always present in the Champions League.
Another factor is the general lack of depth in
MLS. When a team like
Man City loses one or two forwards, they still have players that would be
indisputable starters in other teams (
Nery Castillo, Felipe
Caicedo). Here in the US if
DCU loses Moreno or Emilio they sometimes turn to midfielders like
Quaranta.
There's definitely a danger in the Becks loan to Milan. Some say the move
could be permanent at the end of next season. That would be
atrocious for the league since they would lose the new fan base that may have taken a few more years to become permanent. Still, the LA Galaxy's ridiculous record (no playoffs for two seasons and over 50 goals against this season) is easily another factor. Ultimately, if
Beckham goes, everyone loses here in the US and the only consolation prize may be the Designated Player rule--maybe adding an additional one won't hurt. Bringing players like Henry,
Ronaldo and
Figo may attract some fans but nowhere near as many as Becks brought to our shores. A longer season a-la-Europe may be a tough sell at this point but then again so is the idea of a single table due to the extreme distances between cities in this country. Another option is the two tournament style league that dictates, in South America and Mexico, places in the
Concachampions,
Sudamericana and
Libertadores.
Gazidis and
Garber have hinted at future changes in scheduling. That is a start. But with the Becks
dilemma and poor showings internationally, things suddenly look difficult for
MLS... and they're thinking of expansion cities.